'Gog
and Magog' lend new meaning to 'opiate of the peoples' –
Waiting for Allah is anything but Islamic!
Zahir
Ebrahim | Project
Humanbeingsfirst.org
California,
Thursday, January 24, 2019
PREAMBLE
The Muslims,
most of us drowning in a surfeit of faith from ear to ear, are simply
“waiting for Allah” thinking it is the “Last Days
of Gog and Magog” that no mere mortals may withstand. So why
bother? For, it is argued before them, an “indestructible
power” the almighty creator hath himself calculatingly
fashioned to fulfill his own (murderous) prophesies in order to
finally rain divine justice upon the Earth – right after he
hath rained phosphorous bombs upon children, women, men, the elderly,
and destroyed their innocent civilizations at the very hands of his
own “indestructible” hectoring hegemons to bring
all that planned divine justice to fruition!
What an idiotic
and cruel god whose imagination only extends from genesis to genocide
in order to fashion creation. And while that is merely immanent, far
more grotesque is the idiotic imbecilic mass of followers who malign
their own Almighty Creator whom they daily aver to believe in, Who
repeatedly describes Itself in the very Book they hold most sacred as
“the Beneficent, the Merciful”! How can both be true
simultaneously – create evil to accomplish his agenda while
proclaiming to be merciful – unless it is a Zeus like
fickle-minded god who enjoys games of cruel self-indulgence at the
expense of his creation?
Can
learned people not think with some rational logic, even when they be
spiritually inclined, that any earthly devil couldn't wish for a
better neutralization of any impediment emanating from the masses for
its own “imperial mobilization” agendas? Give
people their opiate in their right hand, while enslaving them with
the left! Give them what they believe is divinely ordained –
the majority will remain occupied in their pious and pecuniary
pursuits believing it is all the 'will' of their god(s)! And more
apropos to modernity, inculcate a trust in so called “experts”
so that one may be convinced to suspend one's own commonsense and
rational judgment. Witness the events of 911 where the catastrophic
mode of failure of the tall buildings preclude all and sundry from
even thinking that it could have been an “inside job”!
Why? because the “experts” say 19 jihadis did it!
Woe
be to them all who manufacture pretexts and justifications to not
side with the truth, who lead people astray to make it appear that
the helpless screaming victims is god's own work as destined, which
none may alter; woe be to them all who remain busy in pious
interlocution in their mosques, churches, temples while cataclysmic
'Shock and Awe' is continually visited upon innocent civilian
populations. There is none on planet earth who can claim they haven't
witnessed the preying of the vultures and vampires for which, surely,
the Creator too must curse its own creation for their apathy despite
plentiful guidance to every peoples!
What will thee,
Oh people of the cloth, take to thine grave – a barrel full of
gold and a ledger full of piety while God's creation was burned and
starved at the hands of the hectoring hegemons right before thy
twirling rosaries? Many an atheist show far greater moral acumen and
disquiet in their actions when they rush to the aid of suffering
humanity – for indeed, a moral compass appears to be built into
us human beings, we who can reason, and we who can reflect, all
killed by the eschatological gibberish fashioned by priests shilling
for the enemies of mankind! While the misanthropes remain busy
building corrupting institutions and instruments of co-option to
create 'one-world' government, the sheeples are kept busy chasing
absurdities.
We begin with
surely the most diabolical idea ever invented for inducing voluntary
servitude in mankind in the realm of religion: Waiting for Allah; and
it is for the common man to help Allah shorten that Waiting –
Eschatology, the Last Days, and what is metaphorically labeled 'Gog
and Magog' in the Christian tradition, and 'Hajuj and Mahjuj' in the
Holy Qur'an. For the latter, we go to the contemporary domain expert
in Islamic Eschatology, Sheikh Imran N. Hosein, whose interpretation
of 'Gog and Magog', imaginative and intriguing though it may be,
lends new meaning to 'opiate of the peoples'.
By the yardstick
of rational faculty of which the human mind is amply endowed and
enjoined to be used by the Holy Qur'an, Imran Hosein's Eschatological
viewpoint whose broad contours are quite prevalent among pious
Muslims, reduces the religion of Islam to an absurdity. Of course,
this assessment is only from the mind of a humble student, a common
man, and not a scholar. One of course hastens to thank one's Creator
that the tools of rational logic are also made available to the
common man, albeit in different measures, and not given in monopoly
to anyone.
Can
a fallible creation, us, human beings, construct, or orchestrate,
something that is divine in its purpose? Something useful: maybe.
Something destructive: always. Evil: surely. But divine?
Perhaps
that ought to be capitalized as Divine, as it is speaking of the idea
of man being the instrument of God. But I'll continue to use the
lower case form because the notion can hardly be imputed to God. It
is man made and traces to all the mythical gods of antiquity who
played their divine games at the expense of man, from Ram and Vishnu
et. al. in the ancient Indian civilization which still informs the
cultural and religious ethos of modern India, to Zeus and Apollo on
Mount Olympus in the Hellenic civilization of the ancient Greeks and
Romans whose legacy of intellectual thought informs the West.
Simple
logic reveals the absurdity of this notion which is why I persist in
the lower case usage of divinity to reflect my analysis of its human
origins. If a divine needs evil mortals to do its dirty work to
fulfill its divine plan, then the creation must possesses powers
greater than its creator! The creator can't do its own dirty work and
relies on us to do it – then on what basis of justice would it
hold the creation accountable for fulfilling its own divine plan?
Never mind that why should we worship it if we have greater powers.
And therein lies a logical conundrum as old as mankind for all the
divinely-learned on the planet who have had people do god's evil work
in the name of their gods. Today these divinely-learned pulpits
continue their absurdity by announcing the final unleashing of 'Gog
and Magog' and the 'Last Days' based on how humanity has progressed
into abject corruption and slavery to money and power in this
Technetronic age, that in fact, it is all god's work. See “Last
Days of Gog and Magog”
( http://imranhosein.org/media/books/ivgmmw.pdf
).
Imran
Hosein, the scholar-preacher extraordinaire of Pakistani origin and
the enigmatic author of Last Days of Gog and Magog, is on the mark
on his analysis of 9/11 as an inside job and part of a long running
conspiracy by the international banking cabal to take over the
world. His advocacy however based on his gog and magog gibberish, to
disengage completely from this world like the 'people of the cave'
of Surah Al Kahf, to do nothing until the promised salvation of the
'Last Days' arrives, puts him squarely in the camp of supporters of
tyranny. What a shame!
Surah
Al Kahf, Chapter 18 of the Holy Qur'an, is likely the most
allegorical, metaphorical, and speculation-rife Chapter in the
entire Good Book whose meaning can only be known to the Author of
the Holy Qur'an, or to those designated in the Good Book as
“rasikhoon-fil-ilm”, as in verse 3:7.
For anyone else, whether he wears a sanctioned turban or a western
academic gown, to speciously speculate upon metaphorical verses to
advance the argument of “disengagement” and to leave the
world wide open for the harvest of tyranny, can only be the work of
a very simpleton fool, or a very sophisticated social scientist
finding new ways to induce voluntary servitude among the masses.
Yes,
I too think it is gods', and not God's.
When
the dogmatic, more interested in the immanent metaphors of
eschatology than the more mundane matters of the here and the now –
such as the empirical, to be dealt with today, with perhaps the
straightforward Commandments like that expressed in Surah Al-Asr
(Chapter 103 in the Holy Qur'an), or the straightforward Biblical
Golden Rule expressed in the New and Old Testaments (Do unto
others as you have them do unto you, The Holy Bible: Matthew
7:12, Luke 6:31; Old Testament Mosaic Law;) – preach to their
faithful choir that the corruption on earth is in fulfillment of some
divine prophesy so that god can finally bring justice to a suffering
humanity at the End of Time, then they are effectively arguing that
the corrupters are really doing the divine's work! And the public
should not interfere with it, that if anything, as some religious
fanatics among all three Abrahamic religions proclaim, they should be
aided and abetted to hasten that outcome. How convenient for the
hectoring hegemons that they are now doing “divine work”
with the pulpits' blessings from two of the largest religions of man!
Furthermore,
imagine being sold on the idea that all those wonderful Platitudes
and Commandments in all those treasured Holy Books which none could
enforce because the hectoring hegemons throughout the ages usurped
peoples' rights and enslaved them, could in fact only be implemented
by some awaited savior to be sent down by god. For indeed, it
is but a truism, as Aldous Huxley had put it, that “nothing
is easier than to formulate high ideals, but few things are more
difficult than to discover the means for by those ideals might be
implemented, and the categorical imperatives which spring from them
can be a pain. This is the real problem”. Thus imagine this
problem of impracticality being solved eschatologically, in a
self-perpetuating, self-fulfilling prophecy:
(1)
don't even bother resisting evil because you will fail, since it's
all happening by divine decree ;
(2)
thus don't challenge your rulers and their oppressions even while you
recognize them as oppressors, they rule as god's vicegerent on earth
;
(3)
it's all written in the Good Book (“Obey Allah and obey the
Messenger and those charged with authority among you” –
Qur'an Surah An-Nisa, Chapter 4, verse 59) , can't you read you
heathens, that Muslim tyrants are a mercy from god as they hasten
mankind towards the 'Last Days' when justice will finally reign
supreme, and so we must not resist ; not to ignore the pious
Christians' Holy Book (“I am free to submit to authority. I
am free to make myself a slave. My friends, you are free, you are
free to respect and appreciate the authority of the government that
god gives to you - Honor the King! The way you talk about your
government, it's so easy to complain isn't it? It is so easy to
criticize, it is so easy to find fault. Honor the King. Do it anyway,
whether the king deserves it or not. All authority, all authority is
an extension of god's authority!” – from the bizarre
Biblical sermon outlining the New
American Theology of Civil Submission,
April 14, 2008) ;
(4)
for the 'Last Days' prophesy to be fulfilled, the whole world must
become filled with injustice and oppression, and only then will the
Mahdi, and/or the Messiah, shall be made to return by the Will of God
to fashion a new righteous world army which will fight tyranny to end
all injustice on earth once and for all ;
(5)
until then, since any battle with tyrants is futile, just work on
saving your imaan (beliefs) ; focus on personal piety ; go back to
the basics to being 'good Muslims' ; spiritually prepare to be
eligible to join the Army of the Mahdi/Messiah in the unknown
tomorrow whose numbers will be limited and only those of the highest
spiritual merit will be accepted ; for today be content with
purifying your hearts and controlling your carnal desires as you
continue to “Render unto Caesar the things which are
Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s”
(New Testament, Matthew 22:21) ; etceteras.
(6)
It would be a travesty to neglect to mention the most remarkable
gibberish among that set, what the newest preacher to burst onto the
internet-scene preaches in polished English vernacular : disengage
from this world entirely like the 'people of the cave' of Surah Al
Kahf until the promised salvation of the 'Last Days' arrives.
I
have heard this convoluted logic in several variations since 911 when
the mosques in the United States suddenly became full of the pious
trying to be 'good Muslims' who 'United We Stand' with empire as
heathens like me took to the streets protesting the impending
destruction of innocent civilians in Iraq. (See Chapter
8
of Prisoners of the Cave, my 2003 book)
The
logic method known as Reductio ad absurdum (Latin, literally:
reduction to the absurd; a method of disproving a proposition by
showing that its inevitable consequences would be absurd, or lead to
self-contradiction; conversely, also a method of indirectly proving a
proposition by assuming its negation to be true and showing that this
leads to an absurdity), applied rigorously to the above observations
demonstrates all these to be based on the absurd premise of “God's
Will” for some “Divine Plan” which requires tyranny
to become ubiquitous before God Shall intervene to end it.
Let's
dissect this premise and see what happens if it is presumed to be
true:
(1)
If God needs evil men and women to implement its divine plan, then
creation becomes more enabled than the creator and the creator
depends on its own creation, and thus the key abstract philosophical
attribute of God being Self-sustaining; Self-sufficient;
Self-consistent; Free from contradiction; Free from defects; Not
dependent on anyone or anything; Omnipotent, “kun fa-ya-kun”
(Be, and it is); etc., is thrown out the window ; the question is
akin to the logical fallacy “can God create a stone which he
cannot lift”, meaning, if God can do anything, if God is
defined as Omnipotent, then can God limit himself to become dependent
on its own creation to do its bidding, similarly, can God put the
unjust in heaven and the just ones in hell contrary to his own prime
directive on supreme justice and his own attribute of being the Most
Just, etceteras., all these creating irreconcilable contradictions
among the attributes themselves thus making for a defective God who
is not free from contradictions --- So, either the God premise is
false, the attributes ascribed to God are false, or the premise being
tested is false, and for those who accept the God premise on faith
(as it is un-falsifiable and therefore in the realm of faith), and
accept by way of reasoning the philosophical attribute that a God
must be free from all defects and perfect in all his attributes
without contradictions among them or else He is not Divine, the only
remaining choice is to reject the premise in question ;
(2)
failure of the lofty moral platitudes in the Holy Books, the Bible,
the Qur'an, the Ten Commandments, not to neglect other moral
scriptures sacred to man in other civilizations, in accomplishing
man's spiritual guidance for a moral existence, thus necessitating
Divine Intervention in the form of the Eschatology of the Last Days,
a Mahdi, a Messiah, to finally bring justice to mankind
by breaking its bonds of servitude to fellow man as man couldn't live
up to the Divine Guidance himself to accomplish it himself ; the very
concept of Divine Intervention of the Last Days presupposes that
Divine Guidance failed in its Categorical Imperative to reform man by
giving him the choice to establish justice among themselves but man
failed to live up to the Divine Guidance and it will be forced onto
man by Divine Intervention of the Mahdi, the Messiah in
the Last Days ---- so what was the point of that entire
exercise of Divine Guidance? So either the Guidance is Divine in
which case it cannot fail not only because God understands both the
Guidance and the target of that Guidance since He created them both
and coupled them together, but also because of the fact that God is
free from defects and cannot fail, and therefore the presupposition
is false; or it was not divine and failed because it did not
understand the nature of man and its primacy as well as its sheep
instincts, in which case the outcome is already predictable ; but it
cannot be both Divine and fail in its own stated purpose (see the
Dialog on the Creation of Adam in Surah Al-Baqara) ;
(3)
evil triumphing becoming the pre-requisite for justice and peace
among mankind pushes the Mephistophelian end justify the means
dogma of expediency and military style “objectivity” to
achieve any target as morally legitimate, which is antithetical to
the moral codes of not just all three Abrahamic religions, but all
theistic moral philosophies and traditions creating a
self-contradiction of monumental proportions if then God Himself
indulges in it to achieve His Divine Plan ; and
(4)
a catch-22 in Accountability on the Day of Judgment is created for
the religions which proclaim Heaven and Hell in an Afterlife as
reward or punishment --- what punishment if the evil was necessary
part of the Divine plan and consequently its vile purveyors the
Divine instruments?
As
we see, absurdities pile up upon each other very quickly with even a
modicum of analytical thought if we accept the premise underlying the
Eschatology being taught mankind from virtually all Abrahamic
pulpits, of all sectarian flavors. By the logical reasoning method of
reductio ad absurdum, the premise stands rejected because it leads to
absurdities if presumed true.
It
is reasonable to inquire whether there is any explicit reference to
such “savior cometh”, or to such an absurd Eschatology,
in the categorical and foundational verses of the Holy Qur'an?
Admittedly, I am not a scholar of the scriptures, let alone of the
most profound world religion. Nevertheless, as a thinking student of
scriptures interested in uncovering what the Good Book itself says
rather than what the pen of man says it says, a diligent non-expert
study of the singular scripture of Islam, the Holy Qur'an, reveals
that all the “Mahdi and Messiah returning to free mankind
from its bondage” type beatitudinous concepts of
Eschatology appear to be entirely from pages outside the Holy
Qur'an itself.
It
is noteworthy that: (1) these ideas are prevalent in the Biblical
literature, and arguably, somehow their tenor crept into the Muslim
literature of antiquity penned by the Muslim holy scribes and
narrators of Islamic history; and (2) that these ideas are, at best,
based on wholly speculative interpretations of the metaphorical and
allegorical verses of the Holy Qur'an, and the supposed Prophetic
sayings (Hadiths) to suit one's own fancy, ethos, inclination, and
socialization bias in which one can impute pretty much any
meaning to these metaphorical verses based on how much one believes
in one's own holy books outside the pages of the Holy Qur'an.
In
other words, apart from any subversive agenda to wittingly put
religion in the service of empire, innocent confirmation bias
and unwitting incestuous self-reinforcement appears to have
led to interpreting the speculative verses of the Holy Qur'an on
these Eschatological matters! Who is to say who has got the
right interpretation? The right ijtihad? Are the verses of the
Holy Qur'an poetry that one can imagine them to mean whatever one
fancies? Or are the verses of the Holy Qur'an a specific guidance
unto mankind from its Author? Witness the unequivocal warning in the
Holy Qur'an to refrain from such gratuitous interpretations, and who
specifically have the right to interpret the metaphorical verses of
the Holy Qur'an, in verse 3:7
of Surah Aal-'Imran.
|
“He it
is Who has sent down to thee the Book: In it are verses basic or
fundamental (of established meaning); they are the foundation of
the Book: others are allegorical.
|
هُوَ
الَّذِي أَنْزَلَ
عَلَيْكَ
الْكِتَابَ
مِنْهُ آيَاتٌ
مُحْكَمَاتٌ
هُنَّ أُمُّ
الْكِتَابِ
وَأُخَرُ
مُتَشَابِهَاتٌ
ۖ
|
|
But
those in whose hearts is perversity follow the part thereof that
is allegorical, seeking discord, and searching for its hidden
meanings,
|
فَأَمَّا
الَّذِينَ
فِي قُلُوبِهِمْ
زَيْغٌ فَيَتَّبِعُونَ
مَا تَشَابَهَ
مِنْهُ ابْتِغَاءَ
الْفِتْنَةِ
وَابْتِغَاءَ
تَأْوِيلِهِ
ۗ
|
|
but
no one knows its hidden meanings except Allah[,]
and those who are firmly grounded in knowledge[;]
|
وَمَا
يَعْلَمُ
تَأْوِيلَهُ
إِلَّا اللَّهُ
ۗ وَالرَّاسِخُونَ
فِي الْعِلْمِ
|
|
يَقُولُونَ
آمَنَّا بِهِ
كُلٌّ مِنْ
عِنْدِ رَبِّنَا
ۗ وَمَا يَذَّكَّرُ
إِلَّا أُولُو
الْأَلْبَابِ
|
For
the Shia Muslims for instance, Imam Mahdi is as fundamental a
construct of faith as the Prophet of Islam is, but unfortunately
derives virtually its entire body of beliefs exclusively from pages
outside the Holy Qur'an. Among all the Muslim sects, the Shia
Muslims, like the early Christians, are most profoundly awaiting the
return of the Savior, Imam Mahdi, to whom allegiance and
obedience is pledged in daily ritual prayers. Iran has extended that
obedience to the valih-e-faqih, an ayatollah who rules the
public in Imam Mahdi's name in his absence as his
self-proclaimed temporal lieutenant (wali), imam, under the
rubric of yet another religious dogma of obedience to authority
prevalent among the Shia Muslims called “taqlid”. Iran of
course presents itself as the greatest antagonist of the oppressive
West today. But even as she boldly articulates Ayatollah Khomeini's
conception of the “Great Satan” in her national and
international proclamations, her religious and political leadership
under the valih-e-faqih remain rather timid in calling 9/11
the 'operation canned goods' that it is. One can only imagine
that they are also waiting for Imam Mahdi to call out that
assessment.
Whatever
the actual religious reality of the return of Imam Mahdi and
Messiah may be in the religion of Islam (a point which is orthogonal
to the one being made here), the empirical and unarguable fact of the
matter is that the concept of “Waiting for Allah” (which
includes waiting for any Savior, Mahdi, Messiah when such beliefs
defer mobilizing resistance against systems of tyranny and oppression
until their arrival in the 'Last Days') forms a most powerful opiate
for inducing voluntary servitude as “karma” (as among the
Hindu caste system): a bold and voluntary resignation to fate as
divinely ordained inevitability. What a powerful opiate!
While
our minds may grapple with esoteric matters to comprehend the trend
of current affairs and how it might be charting the course of future
human history, if such grappling concludes that matters are
inevitable regardless of human will, then it makes a mockery of human
will. One might as well dispense with such a religion altogether if
it proclaims all of human affairs are preordained. If man cannot
change himself and change future history as a consequence of it, what
is the purpose of religion?
Allah
enjoined mankind to refect upon His Message, the Holy Qur'an, with
the head while believing with the heart. Of course, even in the
matters of the head, two super scientists can disagree violently on
wholy empirical matters --- so what of Eschatology!
As for the matters of the heart, it has been observed that one man's
love can be another's trash --- so what of objectivity on spiritual
matters?
The
Holy Qur'an invites mankind to open both our heart and our mind in
order to understand its message with ma'arifat, depth
perception. And verse 3:7
Surah Aal-'Imran quoted above,
cautions Muslims against arguing on matters speculative, or creating
bone of contentions when matters are plain. Verse 5:48 enjoins
mankind to focus on fuss-tabi-qul-khairat instead of becoming
arrogant and fighting amongst one another even when one might
disagree passionately with one another. Here is the verse of wise
counsel from the Book of Divine Guidance with which I humbly conclude
this note:
|
If Allah had
so willed, He would have made you a single people, but (His plan
is) to test you in what He hath given you: so strive as in a
race in all virtues. The goal of you all is to Allah; it is
He that will show you the truth of the matters in which ye
dispute. (Surah Al-Maeda 5:48
)
|
وَلَوْ
شَاءَ اللَّهُ
لَجَعَلَكُمْ
أُمَّةً وَاحِدَةً
وَلَٰكِنْ
لِيَبْلُوَكُمْ
فِي مَا آتَاكُمْ
ۖ فَاسْتَبِقُوا
الْخَيْرَاتِ
ۚ إِلَى اللَّهِ
مَرْجِعُكُمْ
جَمِيعًا
فَيُنَبِّئُكُمْ
بِمَا كُنْتُمْ
فِيهِ تَخْتَلِفُونَ
|
As
verse 3:7 avers, Allah, and those who are firmly grounded in
knowledge, know the purpose of 'Hajuj and Mahjuj' best.
References
An inquiry into
the concept of Imam Mahdi as understood from the verses of the
Holy Qur'an is in Zahir Ebrahim, What does the Holy Qur'an say
about The Mahdi - The Awaited Savior of Mankind?
http://faith-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2015/12/the-mahdi-letter-to-young-muslim-scholar.html
The concept of
“taqlid” as understood from the verses of the Holy Qur'an
is in Zahir Ebrahim, What does the Holy Qur'an say about Taqlid -
Blind Following the Non-Infallible?
http://islam-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2013/08/what-does-quran-say-about-taqlid.html
The concept of
“imam” (any leader) vs “Imam” (Leader which
the scripture asserts is only appointed by God) as understood from
the verses of the Holy Qur'an, and
the empirically observed natural inclinations borne of many different
types of unconscious biases that predispose one towards incestuous
self-reinforcement and confirmation bias, are explained
in Zahir Ebrahim, Islam: Why is the Holy Qur'an so easy to hijack?
Part-III,
http://faith-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/08/islam-why-is-quran-easy-to-hijack-pt3.html
The concept of
Rejection Criterion vs Acceptance Criterion vis a vis
the Prophetic Hadith literature as understood from mathematical
closure is explained in Zahir Ebrahim, Islam: Why is the Holy
Qur'an so easy to hijack? Part-IV,
http://faith-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2011/08/islam-why-is-quran-easy-to-hijack-pt4.html
The concept of
“valih-e-faqih” is expounded in Ayatollah (imam)
Khomeini's series of sermons given in Najaf during his exile years
and compiled in his book after the Revolution: Islam and
Revolution (translated in English by Hamid Algar, 1981),
https://web.archive.org/web/20130616014122/http://humanbeingsfirst.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/cacheof-islam-and-revolution-writings-and-declarations-of-imam-khomeini-translated-by-hamid-algar-1981-mizan-press.pdf
The concept of
Divine Rule by Valih-e-Faqih as understood from the verses of the
Holy Qur'an is examined in Zahir Ebrahim, What does the Holy
Qur'an say about Vilayat-i Faqih?
http://islam-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2015/03/what-does-quran-say-about-vilayat-faqih.html
Source URL:
https://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2019/01/critique-of-imran-hosein-gog-and-magog.html
Faith-Politico URL:
https://faith-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2019/01/critique-of-imran-hosein-gog-and-magog.html
Abridged
from Waiting for Allah, April 2009 | Thursday, January 24, 2019
05:00 pm
4607
Critique
of Imran Hosein's 'An Islamic View of Gog and Magog in the Modern
World' By Zahir Ebrahim 11/11